2019
DOI: 10.1111/cura.12311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonic Accessibility: Increasing Social Equity Through the Inclusive Design of Sound in Museums and Heritage Sites

Abstract: Sound and hearing effect everyone, they are not niche issues. Within the inherently multimodal experience of a museum, sound plays a crucial role in defining whether an environment is inclusive or exclusive. Yet sonic accessibility ‐ the multiplicity of ways that sound influences accessibility and social equity ‐ remains under researched in design and narrowly represented in access legislation. This paper charts the contours of sonic exclusion in museums and other heritage sites around three central themes. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Access to technologies cannot be assumed for all groups, including people with disabilities on low incomes, but Constantinou, Loizides, and Ioannou (2016) suggest that barriers to a more widespread use of technology for access to cultural content and exhibitions in museums is often not the cost, but awareness and willingness (see Weisen 2012). Furthermore, technologies are more typically explored relative to sensory disabilities than other forms of disability, such as ID (Seale et al 2021), and some groups, such as people with ID, neurodivergent conditions such as dementia, and a broad range of cognitive disabilities, are underrepresented in terms of navigational information design (Renel 2019).…”
Section: Barriers and Facilitators To Access: Audiences In Arts Venue...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to technologies cannot be assumed for all groups, including people with disabilities on low incomes, but Constantinou, Loizides, and Ioannou (2016) suggest that barriers to a more widespread use of technology for access to cultural content and exhibitions in museums is often not the cost, but awareness and willingness (see Weisen 2012). Furthermore, technologies are more typically explored relative to sensory disabilities than other forms of disability, such as ID (Seale et al 2021), and some groups, such as people with ID, neurodivergent conditions such as dementia, and a broad range of cognitive disabilities, are underrepresented in terms of navigational information design (Renel 2019).…”
Section: Barriers and Facilitators To Access: Audiences In Arts Venue...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions on the exhibition of music and consequently on strategies of display have been mainly conducted in the framework of museum studies with reference to selected displays of popular music (Cortez, 2019; Fairchild, 2017; Fryberger, 2019; Renel, 2019). Such work has focused primarily on forms of presenting and experiencing sound in museum exhibitions (Both, 2019; Botts & Palmer, 2019; Leonard, 2010; Venso, 2019).…”
Section: State Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practical approaches especially have dealt with the topic by discussing various case studies and exhibition projects on music or the integration of sound into museum exhibitions (Brabazon & Mallinder, 2006;Cortez, 2016;Fairchild, 2017;Fryberger, 2019;Mortensen & Madsen, 2015;Renel, 2019). This work has also focused on the presentation of narratives in popular music exhibitions (Leonard, 2007) and on the sonic artefacts of music (Bubaris, 2014;Leonard, 2007;Mortensen, 2012;Mortensen & Madsen, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the 'sensory shift', modern museums have begun to reconsider their limitations to the sensory use of objects, and they are starting to explore the potential of multi-sensory solutions to improve knowledge transfer in museums and increase engagement with visitors by connecting them with the sensory properties of historic objects, their contexts and the stories behind, also providing emotionally enriched experiences. With increasing numbers of studies indicating that interacting with sensory objects have social, cognitive and even therapeutic value, especially for people with disabilities [46][47][48][49][50][51][52], museums are enhancing their valuation on 'touch' which is regarded as a therapy tool and a cultural communication platform [53][54][55][56], 'sound' which creates a sense of spatial experience [57,58] and 'smell' which triggers personal memories, imagination and emotion [59][60][61].…”
Section: Senses As Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%