1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1981.tb01283.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Song Variety in the Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum)

Abstract: Field recordings and playback experiments were conducted on brown thrashers (Toxostoma rufum) in central Massachusetts in order to gather information about the consequences and circumstances of song versatility in this species. The results show the birds to have a large song repertoire in excess of 1,100 song‐types or 2,400 figure‐types. The pattern of introduction of novel figure‐types differed significantly from that predicted from a fixed repertoire model. Some song parameters varied systematically between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many songbirds, including the most commonly studied song learning bird, the zebra finch, learn to sing their single song as a juvenile, and this song remains constant throughout life (Eda-Fujiwara et al 2012). Although this is clearly more limited than the unbounded nature of human speech, other species, such as Northern mockingbirds, continue to learn, even in adulthood, and the song repertoire of the brown thrasher can extend into the thousands (Boughey and Thompson 1981;Kroodsma and Parker 1977). Therefore, research on the genetic, molecular, and neural mechanisms underlying song acquisition in birds may inform human speech acquisition (Bolhuis et al 2010;Brainard and Doupe 2002;Doupe and Kuhl 1999;Doupe et al 2005;Enard 2011;Jarvis 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many songbirds, including the most commonly studied song learning bird, the zebra finch, learn to sing their single song as a juvenile, and this song remains constant throughout life (Eda-Fujiwara et al 2012). Although this is clearly more limited than the unbounded nature of human speech, other species, such as Northern mockingbirds, continue to learn, even in adulthood, and the song repertoire of the brown thrasher can extend into the thousands (Boughey and Thompson 1981;Kroodsma and Parker 1977). Therefore, research on the genetic, molecular, and neural mechanisms underlying song acquisition in birds may inform human speech acquisition (Bolhuis et al 2010;Brainard and Doupe 2002;Doupe and Kuhl 1999;Doupe et al 2005;Enard 2011;Jarvis 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test measures of song complexity using NVI with real-world examples of song diversity, we used natural bird songs of twelve species occurring in different parts of the world. Based on existing literature, expert advice, and availability of acoustic data, we shortlisted six bird species that are believed to have complex songs which included the Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum (Boughey & Thompson, 1981), Common Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos ('The top 10 British birdsongs ', n.d.;Weiss, Hultsch, Adam, Scharff, & Kipper, 2014), Northern Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos (Derrickson & Breitwisch, 1992;Kroodsma, 2015), Song Thrush Turdus philomelos ('The top 10 British birdsongs ', n.d.), White-bellied Sholakili Sholicola albiventris (Purushotham & Robin, 2016), and the White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys ('The Development of Birdsong', n.d.; Nelson & Poesel, 2007). In addition, we chose six more species that are considered to have comparatively simpler songs which included -the Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher Culicicapa ceylonensis, Indian Cuckoo Cuculus micropterus, Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis, Oriental-Magpie Robin Copsychus saularis, Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus, and White-cheeked Barbet Megalaima viridis.…”
Section: Note Variability Index For Real Birdsongsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closest non-human analogue to this culturally transmitted diversity comes from the song systems of some songbirds (e.g. mimic thrushes like the brown thrasher [61,62]) or humpback whales [63 -65], but I know of no animal communication system that comes close to matching the range of diversity in the more than 6000 existing human languages (ethnologue currently reports 6909: www. ethnologue.com).…”
Section: Unity and Diversity Of Language From The Viewpoint Of Linguimentioning
confidence: 99%