2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Song types and their structural features are associated with specific contexts in the banded wren

Abstract: We studied the use of song types and their acoustic features in different social contexts in the banded wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus), a resident tropical songbird in which males possess about 20 distinctive song types varying in duration, bandwidth, note composition, and trill structure. We recorded six focal males intensively for four days each while we observed context information such as during versus after dawn chorus, presence of the female, counter-versus solo-singing, location at the edge versus cen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
55
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since stimulus pairs were obtained from the same individual, we can exclude the possibility that individual quality differences between source birds contributed to the perceived difference between the stimuli. In addition, we used the same song type for the two stimulus types (figure 1) and thus there were no semantic differences between the stimuli ( Trillo & Vehrencamp 2005). It appears therefore that the perceived difference is due to the phenotypic, age-related differences in the songs used as stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since stimulus pairs were obtained from the same individual, we can exclude the possibility that individual quality differences between source birds contributed to the perceived difference between the stimuli. In addition, we used the same song type for the two stimulus types (figure 1) and thus there were no semantic differences between the stimuli ( Trillo & Vehrencamp 2005). It appears therefore that the perceived difference is due to the phenotypic, age-related differences in the songs used as stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested for sex differences in song length by comparing means for males and females within 12 pairs, based on all of their songs. Most female songs were classifiable into types similarly to male song types in this species (Molles, 1999;Trillo and Vehrencamp, 2005). We generated plots of cumulative repertoire size vs. number of songs recorded for each of the 12 females to assess whether we could estimate their repertoire sizes reasonably accurately: only five females with 50 or more songs recorded appeared to reach an asymptote.…”
Section: Female Song Structure Repertoires and Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song is used for territory protection (Searcy et al 2000;Trillo et Vehrencamp 2005) and mate attraction (Nowicki et al 1998;Gil et Gahr 2002 Hennin et al 2009) unpaired males sing also more than paired males probably because they need to attract females. It's a compromise between singing activities and reproductive behavior.…”
Section: Song Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%