2020
DOI: 10.1111/eth.13090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Song matching in a long‐lived, sedentary bird with a low song rate: The importance of song type, song duration and intrusion

Abstract: Territorial songbirds often match the song features or singing patterns of rivals, commonly as an aggressive signal. Most studies of song matching have been on Northern Hemisphere species with short lifespans and high song rates, but vocal matching is predicted to be affected both by longevity and territorial stability. We studied song matching in males of the white-browed scrubwren, Sericornis frontalis, a long-lived, sedentary, territorial Australian songbird. We quantified natural song rate and diversity, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STIs are useful to assess the behavioral response of a focal territorial individual [3]. STIs have been applied in many studies and have been used, for example, to assess song type matching, showing that individuals responded to a playback of a specific song with matching when the song variation was in the repertoire of the territory defender [4,5]. In addition, playbacks were used to assess phylogenetic relationships between different species (e.g., [6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STIs are useful to assess the behavioral response of a focal territorial individual [3]. STIs have been applied in many studies and have been used, for example, to assess song type matching, showing that individuals responded to a playback of a specific song with matching when the song variation was in the repertoire of the territory defender [4,5]. In addition, playbacks were used to assess phylogenetic relationships between different species (e.g., [6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%