2003
DOI: 10.1512/iumj.2003.52.2303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somewhere dense orbits are everywhere dense

Abstract: Abstract. Let T be a continuous linear operator on a locally convex topological vector space X. We show that if x ∈ X has orbit under T that is somewhere dense in X, then the orbit of x under T must be everywhere dense in X, answering a question raised by Alfredo Peris.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
77
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…there is x ∈ X such that Orb( x ) = {αT n (x) : n ∈ N, α ∈ K} is dense ( x denotes the linear span of {x}). For locally convex spaces, Peris [8] proved that (in the obvious sense) multi-supercyclic operators are supercyclic and Bourdon and N. Feldman [4] even showed that Orb( x ) is either everywhere dense or nowhere dense for each vector individually. As for the hypercyclic case, local convexity was only used in the proof of the locally convex version of:…”
Section: : Q(y) = |Q(y)| Defines a Continuous And Open Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there is x ∈ X such that Orb( x ) = {αT n (x) : n ∈ N, α ∈ K} is dense ( x denotes the linear span of {x}). For locally convex spaces, Peris [8] proved that (in the obvious sense) multi-supercyclic operators are supercyclic and Bourdon and N. Feldman [4] even showed that Orb( x ) is either everywhere dense or nowhere dense for each vector individually. As for the hypercyclic case, local convexity was only used in the proof of the locally convex version of:…”
Section: : Q(y) = |Q(y)| Defines a Continuous And Open Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, through Example 3.10 (Example 3.11 and Example 3.12), we show that the adjoint (inverse) of diskcyclic operators need not be diskcyclic. In addition, the somewhere density of the orbit of an operator(the cone generated by orbit) implies the everywhere density of the orbit (cone generated by orbit) [3]. However, we show that the somewhere density of the disk orbit of an operator does not imply to the everywhere density of it, by giving the Counterexample 3.14.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Also we have It follows from Corollary 2.15 that F is diskcyclic. Moreover, the inverse of F is the bilateral backward weighted shift Be n = (1/w n−1 ) e n−1 with weight sequence Bourdon and Feldman in [3] proved that if Orb(T, x) (or COrb (T, x)) is somewhere dense, then Orb(T, x) (or COrb (T, x) respectively) is everywhere dense set. However, If DOrb(T, x) is somewhere dense then the situation is different.…”
Section: Theorem 31 (Second Diskcyclicity Criterion) Let T ∈ B(h)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8] G. Costakis and A. Manoussos have studied the dynamics of linear operators by making use of extended limit sets instead of their orbits. Especially a result due to P. Bourdon and N. Feldman ( [6]) has been generalized by them as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%