2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2006.00336.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somerset's family interventions in psychosis service: an update

Abstract: This paper describes a project in which family interventions in psychosis services were successfully established in a routine clinical setting. This has involved the development of a whole‐team training approach, an accredited one‐year training course, and a clinical approach which integrates the systemic and cognitive‐behavioural psychoeducational approaches. Since the original description of this project (Burbach and Stanbridge, 1998) the training course and service have been evaluated and the clinical appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skill and care is needed in order to help family members to encourage their relative to contribute without criticism or over‐involvement (high expressed emotion), which are unhelpful (Kuipers et al , 1992). Such interventions fit with approaches to family interventions in psychosis that include exploring and building on the individual and family's competencies and strengths as part of integrating systemic and psycho‐social interventions (for example, Burbach and Stanbridge, 2006; Meddings et al , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skill and care is needed in order to help family members to encourage their relative to contribute without criticism or over‐involvement (high expressed emotion), which are unhelpful (Kuipers et al , 1992). Such interventions fit with approaches to family interventions in psychosis that include exploring and building on the individual and family's competencies and strengths as part of integrating systemic and psycho‐social interventions (for example, Burbach and Stanbridge, 2006; Meddings et al , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the number of barriers mitigating against the delivery of family intervention, some services have been successful in implementing family interventions within general mental health services, including the community services supporting those experiencing psychosis (Burbach & Stanbridge, 2006;Fadden, 1997;Kelly & Newstead, 2004;Smith & Velleman, 2002;Stanbridge & Burbach, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Family interventions in psychosis have been found to decrease relapse rates, psychotic symptoms, burden of care and hospital admission rates, and improve treatment compliance, social functioning and health outcomes …”
Section: The Importance Of Family Work In Early Psychosismentioning
confidence: 99%