1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf01909266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some variants of the Freeman-Carroll method

Abstract: Two difference-differential methods for the evaluation of kinetic parameters from non-isothermal data are analysed.In order to determine kinetic parameters from non-isothermal data, the difference-differential method proposed by Freeman and Carroll [1 ] is widely used [2,3 ]. The main relationship on which the Freeman-Carroll method is based as follows:where A = difference operator, c~ = conversion degree, t = time, n = reaction order, E = activation energy, R = gas constant = 1.987 cal mole -i K -1, T --tempe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the decomposition activation energies of the above polymers have been calculated by the Freeman-Carroll differential method [44], which can be expressed by the following equation lg…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the decomposition activation energies of the above polymers have been calculated by the Freeman-Carroll differential method [44], which can be expressed by the following equation lg…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segal and Fatu proposed a model to predict kinematic parameters from TGA/DTG data for non-isothermal reactions . To use this method, isokinetic conditions must exist during the experiment.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segal and Fatu proposed a model to predict kinematic parameters from TGA/DTG data for non-isothermal reactions. 16 To use this method, isokinetic conditions must exist during the experiment. According to the DTG curve displayed in Figure 1a, both 320 and 360 °C have the same rate of reaction.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%