1978
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some variables affecting dentists’ desire to use expanded duty dental auxiliaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that liberalization of statutory prohibitions against task delegation in dental and ambulatory settings will not be sufficient to prompt staffing-mix changes. Reinhardt's work (1970) is indicative of this concern, as are survey results for dentists (Cohen 1978;McKenzie and Born 1973;Leske and Leverett 1976) and for physicians (Lawrence et al 1977). These surveys show that only about one-third of practitioners would hire an extender, though many approve of the idea in theory.…”
Section: Practice Act Limitations Career Mobility and Health Delivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that liberalization of statutory prohibitions against task delegation in dental and ambulatory settings will not be sufficient to prompt staffing-mix changes. Reinhardt's work (1970) is indicative of this concern, as are survey results for dentists (Cohen 1978;McKenzie and Born 1973;Leske and Leverett 1976) and for physicians (Lawrence et al 1977). These surveys show that only about one-third of practitioners would hire an extender, though many approve of the idea in theory.…”
Section: Practice Act Limitations Career Mobility and Health Delivementioning
confidence: 99%