2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some vaguely explored (but not trivial) costs of tail autotomy in lizards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
40
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) I recorded all postautotomy trials within 1-2 days of initiating autotomy, whereas McElroy and Bergmann recorded their trials 14 days post-autotomy. Following autotomy, it is known that body condition declines as resources are diverted towards regeneration (Dial and Fitzpatrick, 1981;Maginnis, 2006;Naya et al, 2007;Wrinn and Uetz, 2007;Fleming et al, 2009;Jagnandan et al, 2014) and could decrease maximum sprint speeds Fleming et al, 2009). In this study, the autotomized tail represented 6-10% of the intact body weight, which could have enabled greater running speeds immediately after tail loss because lizards had less weight to carry.…”
Section: Kinematic Changes Associated With Tail Lossmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) I recorded all postautotomy trials within 1-2 days of initiating autotomy, whereas McElroy and Bergmann recorded their trials 14 days post-autotomy. Following autotomy, it is known that body condition declines as resources are diverted towards regeneration (Dial and Fitzpatrick, 1981;Maginnis, 2006;Naya et al, 2007;Wrinn and Uetz, 2007;Fleming et al, 2009;Jagnandan et al, 2014) and could decrease maximum sprint speeds Fleming et al, 2009). In this study, the autotomized tail represented 6-10% of the intact body weight, which could have enabled greater running speeds immediately after tail loss because lizards had less weight to carry.…”
Section: Kinematic Changes Associated With Tail Lossmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, tail autotomy may lead to decreased shortor long-term survival (Fox and McCoy, 2000) as a result of decreased running performance (Martin and Avery, 1998), changes to escape behavior (Downes and Shine, 2001), increased energetic costs to regenerate the tail (Naya et al, 2007), and decreased reproductive fitness (Dial and Fitzpatrick, 1981). Yet even some of these findings may be contradictory (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This remarkable ability has evolved multiple times within lizards and different species exhibit a range of mechanisms enabling tail loss, such as fracture planes between or within vertebrae, and a host of modifications to other tail tissues, including blood vessels and musculature (Etheridge, 1967). After separation, the muscles of the autotomized tail can continue to contract and these movements act to distract a predator long enough for the lizard to escape (Dial and Fitzpatrick, 1983;Naya et al, 2007;Rumping and Jayne, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy expenditures of intact and tailless animals have been measured by various authors (Congdon et al 1974;Vitt et al 1977;Dial and Fitzpatrick 1981;Bellairs and Bryant 1985;Naya and Bozinovic 2006;Naya et al 2007). It is important to bear in mind that most lizards are able to fully regenerate a lost tail (Arnold 1988).…”
Section: Tail Autotomy Does Not Change Rmr In Lygodactylus Capensismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tail regeneration is an energetically expensive process (Chapple et al 2002); therefore, if energy expenditure is measured some time after tail loss, the effects of tail loss are compounded with regeneration costs, and these animals are likely to demonstrate higher RMRs (compared with intact animals). For example, a 15% increase in food intake and a 26% increase in standard metabolic rate have been recorded for Liolaemus nitidus (Liolaemidae) autotomized 3 wk before measurement (Naya and Bozinovic 2006), a 36% increase in standard metabolic rate has been measured for Liolaemus belli 1 wk after autotomy (Naya et al 2007), and a 25% increase in energy intake has been measured for tailless Coleonyx brevis geckos undergoing "rapid tail regeneration" (Dial and Fitzpatrick 1981). There was no difference recorded for Coleonyx variegatus (Congdon et al 1974; time since autotomy unknown).…”
Section: Tail Autotomy Does Not Change Rmr In Lygodactylus Capensismentioning
confidence: 99%