1979
DOI: 10.1016/0094-1190(79)90033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some unresolved issues in the location theory of the firm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now an interesting question arises: What happens to location outcome when the production function is homogeneous of degree n? Under this condition, substituting (14) into (23') and (24'), respectively, and noting u'(x) 0, we obtain: HONG HWANG AND CHOA-CHENG iVIAI Both the profit-maximizing monopolist's and the welfaremaximizing producer's locations are invariant with respect to a change in demand if and only if the production function is constant returns to scale, i.e., n = i. But, they are closer to (farther away from) the market site as demand increases if and only if the production function is increasing (decreasing) returns to scale, i.e., n > l (n < l).…”
Section: The Location Effect Of a Change In Demandmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Now an interesting question arises: What happens to location outcome when the production function is homogeneous of degree n? Under this condition, substituting (14) into (23') and (24'), respectively, and noting u'(x) 0, we obtain: HONG HWANG AND CHOA-CHENG iVIAI Both the profit-maximizing monopolist's and the welfaremaximizing producer's locations are invariant with respect to a change in demand if and only if the production function is constant returns to scale, i.e., n = i. But, they are closer to (farther away from) the market site as demand increases if and only if the production function is increasing (decreasing) returns to scale, i.e., n > l (n < l).…”
Section: The Location Effect Of a Change In Demandmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Its slope can be determined by the total differential of (12), i.e., (13) ~x=0 = TTXX dx Since ~xx < 0, it follows from (13) that the sign of ~--Mis indeterminate, it depends upon the sign of ~xM 9 The latter, in turn, ig'aependent upon the characteristics of the producHon function in question. In what follows, we assume that the production function is homogeneous of degree n. Equation (1) then becomes: (14) It follows from (13'), (16) and (17) that the loci W x = 0; W~[ = 0; ~. = 0; and WM = 0 are all positively (negatively) sloped if the production func~on is decreasing (increasing) returns to scale, i.e., n < l (n > l).…”
Section: Welfare-maximizing Solution Versus Profit-maximizing Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A well-known component of the location theory of the firm, dubbed the ''exclusion theorem,'' has attracted the attention of many economists (for example, Sakashita 1967;Mathur 1979;Higano 1985). The theorem states that when a profit-maximizing or cost-minimizing firm chooses its optimal location between the input and the output markets along a line, there is no possibility of an intermediate location under the reasonable assumption that transport rates are constant or decreasing with distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The particular references here are Weber (1929), Moses (1958), Sakashita (1967), Mathur (1979), and Mai (1981). 5.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%