2014
DOI: 10.4204/eptcs.161.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Turing-Complete Extensions of First-Order Logic

Abstract: We introduce a natural Turing-complete extension of first-order logic FO. The extension adds two novel features to FO. The first one of these is the capacity to add new points to models and new tuples to relations. The second one is the possibility of recursive looping when a formula is evaluated using a semantic game. We first define a game-theoretic semantics for the logic and then prove that the expressive power of the logic corresponds in a canonical way to the recognition capacity of Turing machines. Fina… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rather tame such an operator, i.e., a modifier, is employed in [21] in order to obtain a Turing complete logic L (see [21] for the syntax and semantics). A possible reading of an L-formula ϕ states that it is possible to verify ϕ.…”
Section: There Exists An Assignment S Such Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rather tame such an operator, i.e., a modifier, is employed in [21] in order to obtain a Turing complete logic L (see [21] for the syntax and semantics). A possible reading of an L-formula ϕ states that it is possible to verify ϕ.…”
Section: There Exists An Assignment S Such Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it would be interesting to understand new clocking patterns in general, in addition to the finitely bounded, the f -bounded and the free semantics discussed above. These investigations could naturally be pushed to involve more general logics beyond modal logic, possibly containing, e.g., operators that modify the underlying models, and thereby directly linking to the research on the general logical framework of [19] and the research program of [19] and [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the games are not determined, i.e., it is possible that neither player has a winning strategy (consider, e.g., the formula µX X ). This free semantics for modal logic results in a system that is essentially directly a fragment of the general, Turing-complete logic L of [19]. On the other hand, the different "clocking scenarios" described above (and further variants thereof) can be naturally imposed on L , and it would indeed make sense to study related phenomena in that framework.…”
Section: Variants With Ptime Model Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The striking simplicity of D * and the link between team semantics and gametheory make D * a particularly interesting system. There of course exist other logical frameworks where RE can be easily captured, such as abstract state machines [8], [1] and the recursive games of [12]. However, D * provides a simple unified perspective on recent advances in descriptive complexity based on team semantics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, D * provides a simple unified perspective on recent advances in descriptive complexity based on team semantics. The framework of [12] resembles D * since it provides a perspective on RE that explains computational notions via game-theoretic concepts, but the approach in [12] uses potentially infinite games (and the article [12] also lacks a compositional approach). The approach provided by D * is different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%