1971
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(71)90124-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some thoughts on the nature of ectopic parathyroid hormones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a study of 26 patients with cancer (20 were normocalcemic; 6 were hypercalcemic and 2 of these had a clear-cut ectopic hyperparathyroidism syndrome) Roof, Carpenter, Fink, and Gordan (14) found that the more sensitive of their two antisera failed to recognize IPTH in the sera of 11 of these 26 patients, but IPTH could be detected in these patients using the other antiserum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, in a study of 26 patients with cancer (20 were normocalcemic; 6 were hypercalcemic and 2 of these had a clear-cut ectopic hyperparathyroidism syndrome) Roof, Carpenter, Fink, and Gordan (14) found that the more sensitive of their two antisera failed to recognize IPTH in the sera of 11 of these 26 patients, but IPTH could be detected in these patients using the other antiserum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Whether this fragment is also active in other tissues remains to be explored. The presence of long-persisting, biologically, and immunologically active PTH fragment in the circulation explains why, according to reports from several laboratories, plasma or serum PTH may be normal in some patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (13,14). Antisera having high affinity for glandular hormone but low affinity for peak III would be expected to yield assay results in the normal range in hyperparathyroidism even though the actual concentration of biologically active hormone is high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some new antibodies, evidence was presented from two groups that circulating immunoreactive PTH in hypercalcaemic cancer patients differed from authentic PTH (Roof et al, 1971;Benson et al, 1974), and furthermore the levels in plasma were lower than in primary hyperparathyroidism. In one study, the cancer immunoreactivity was significantly non-parallel to PTH standards (Roof et al, 1971), and in the other it was of higher molecular weight than PTH (Benson et al, 1974).…”
Section: Hypercalcaemia I N Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some new antibodies, evidence was presented from two groups that circulating immunoreactive PTH in hypercalcaemic cancer patients differed from authentic PTH (Roof et al, 1971;Benson et al, 1974), and furthermore the levels in plasma were lower than in primary hyperparathyroidism. In one study, the cancer immunoreactivity was significantly non-parallel to PTH standards (Roof et al, 1971), and in the other it was of higher molecular weight than PTH (Benson et al, 1974). A crucial study carried out at that time, however, was that of Powell et al (1973) who found in several patients with humoral hypercalcaemia whose tumour extracts resorbed bone in vitro, that PTH could not be detected either in plasma or in tumour extracts, despite the use of a wide range of PTH antisera directed against several different parts of the molecule.…”
Section: Hypercalcaemia I N Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%