2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x0033343x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some theoretical and practical implications of defining aptitude and reasoning in terms of each other

Abstract: Stanovich & West continue a history of norm-setting that began with deference to reasonable people's opinions, followed by adherence to probability theorems. They return to deference to reasonable people, with aptitude test performance substituting for reasonableness. This allows them to select independently among competing theories, but defines reasoning circularly in terms of aptitude, while aptitude is measured using reasoning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, theoretical perspectives argue that monogamy and/or relationship investment are valued in harsh environments, such as those where resources are scarce in relative or absolute terms (see, e.g. 24,25 , for discussion), and the pair bonding hypothesis 14 proposes that kissing plays an important role in how couples maintain and monitor the quality of a committed romantic relationship. Thus, we test the pair bonding hypothesis by examining whether individuals from countries of low absolute and relative wealth (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, theoretical perspectives argue that monogamy and/or relationship investment are valued in harsh environments, such as those where resources are scarce in relative or absolute terms (see, e.g. 24,25 , for discussion), and the pair bonding hypothesis 14 proposes that kissing plays an important role in how couples maintain and monitor the quality of a committed romantic relationship. Thus, we test the pair bonding hypothesis by examining whether individuals from countries of low absolute and relative wealth (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that performance on the SAT, claimed to be a measure of cognitive ability, correlates with what is traditionally taken to be correct responding on those tasks (cf. Goodie & Williams, 2000). They argue that this correlation vindicates the traditional standards of correctness, since “more reflective, engaged, and intelligent reasoners are more likely to respond in accord with normative principles” (Stanovich & West, 2000, p. 652).…”
Section: Philosophical Implications Of Cognitive Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%