Communication Theory 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315080918-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Tentative Axioms of Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
60
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though reflective self-presentation is a performative act determined by individually and socially ascribed roles and values (Azariah, 2016; Goffman, 1959), it is apparent that we do not reflect upon how we present ourselves in each and every moment of our lives. ‘Activity or inactivity, words or silence all have message value: they influence others and these others, in turn, cannot not respond to these communications and are thus themselves communicating’ (Watzlawick et al, 2007: 275). In other words: We communicate ourselves to others, even if we do not mean to do so.…”
Section: Theoretical Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though reflective self-presentation is a performative act determined by individually and socially ascribed roles and values (Azariah, 2016; Goffman, 1959), it is apparent that we do not reflect upon how we present ourselves in each and every moment of our lives. ‘Activity or inactivity, words or silence all have message value: they influence others and these others, in turn, cannot not respond to these communications and are thus themselves communicating’ (Watzlawick et al, 2007: 275). In other words: We communicate ourselves to others, even if we do not mean to do so.…”
Section: Theoretical Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Tinbergen (1953) and Lorenz (1952), as well as his own research, Bateson (1955) has shown that vocalizations, intention movements, and mood signs of animals are analogic communications by which they define the nature of their relationships, rather than making denotative statements about objects. [93] cannot be done, then the garbage going in becomes the garbage coming out.…”
Section: From Speech Communication To the World Generated By Naming Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, communication has been defined as a context-dependent construct, which is closely related to well-being and distinct from functional linguistic skills of an individual [15, 23, 24]. In line with Watzlawick et al’s widely acknowledged first axiom [35] “one cannot not communicate” (p. 30), it can be assumed that even patients with strongly impaired linguistic skills are able to communicate, albeit by other channels. Second, communication has been considered as a process that can be divided into four stages: presentation, attention, comprehension, and remembering [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the level of presentation, for example, word finding failures, sentence fragments as well as reductions in grammatical complexity represent linguistic characteristics of people with dementia [22, 26]. Third, the second axiom of Watzlawick et al [35] proposes a content versus a relationship aspect. The content aspect refers to the production and understanding of mainly verbal utterances; the relationship aspect refers to the underlying affective qualities of communication conveyed by mainly nonverbal stylistic (e.g., speech rate) and tonal features of communication (e.g., emotional tone of voice; [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%