“…In the views of chemists, Si=Si should obviously make a much better model of a silicon dimer on a Si(100)-2×1 surface than C=C. Although the comparison should definitely be treated with caution and although the number of chemical reactions studied with disilenes fades in comparison with the number of reactions investigated with alkenes, the predictions for -NO 2 , -NO, -N 3 , O 2 , and several other cycloaddition reactions with Si(100)-2×1 were accurate, based on the reactions with disilenes reported by Gillette et al in the late 1980s and in early 1990 s [37][38][39] and reactions of Si(100)-2×1 with alkenes and dienes were very similar to the chemistry reported by several groups [40][41][42][43][44] and reviewed by Weidenbruch [45][46][47][48]. Especially noteworthy is the fact that the processes following the initial attachment chemistry can also be compared quite reliably.…”