1985
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(85)90249-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some rolling contact experiments using Perspex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth rate of 0.13 nm/cycle is characteristic for the second region. These growth rates are appreciable lower than that reported by Uzel et al 17 There could be two reasons for that. First, the load on the contact in the case reported here was almost two times lower than that used by them.…”
Section: Crack Growthcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The growth rate of 0.13 nm/cycle is characteristic for the second region. These growth rates are appreciable lower than that reported by Uzel et al 17 There could be two reasons for that. First, the load on the contact in the case reported here was almost two times lower than that used by them.…”
Section: Crack Growthcontrasting
confidence: 52%