2012
DOI: 10.4171/rmi/666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some revisited results about composition operators on Hardy spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since C ϕ (H ∞ ) ⊆ H ∞ , C ϕ maps HM Ψ into itself and C ϕ : H Ψ → H Ψ being compact, its restriction C ϕ : HM Ψ → HM Ψ is compact too. We know that the evaluation δ a : f ∈ HM Ψ → f (a) ∈ C has norm ≈ Ψ Other consequences will be given in the subsequent paper [10].…”
Section: Some Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since C ϕ (H ∞ ) ⊆ H ∞ , C ϕ maps HM Ψ into itself and C ϕ : H Ψ → H Ψ being compact, its restriction C ϕ : HM Ψ → HM Ψ is compact too. We know that the evaluation δ a : f ∈ HM Ψ → f (a) ∈ C has norm ≈ Ψ Other consequences will be given in the subsequent paper [10].…”
Section: Some Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We combine the geometric approach with recent results [16,17] that clarify the connection between the Nevanlinna counting function N ϕ and the measure µ ϕ , in order to obtain the following characterization. The article is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have already mentioned, when b ∞ < 1, then H (b) = H 2 , with a norm equivalent to the usual H 2 norm. In this situation, Lefèvre et al [22] characterized reverse Carleson measures under the additional assumption that µ is already a Carleson measure. In [19], the authors were able to get rid of this extra assumption using a balayage type argument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%