2019
DOI: 10.1002/int.22127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some results on information measures for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets

Abstract: Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets (CIFSs), modeled by complex‐valued membership and nonmembership functions with codomain the unit disc in a complex plane, handle two‐dimensional information in a single set. Under this environment, the primary objective of the present study is to introduce some novel formulae of information measures (similarity measures, distance measures, entropies, and inclusion measures) and discuss the transformation relationships among them. To demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparative study of existing and proposed operators is also developed with the help of an example. In future research, it would be interesting to develop some immediate probability geometric and power aggregation operators for the diverse fuzzy environment [43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparative study of existing and proposed operators is also developed with the help of an example. In future research, it would be interesting to develop some immediate probability geometric and power aggregation operators for the diverse fuzzy environment [43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future research work, we can expand the explored operators to neutrosophic set [42][43][44], q-rung orthopair fuzzy set [45][46][47] and other uncertain environments [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check the consistency of the method with some existing studies [42,44,45,52] under the CIFS environment, an analysis is conducted by their method and the corresponding results are discussed as below: (iii) By applying the Garg and Rani [45] method based on correlation coefficient 'C', we obtain the indices values as C(A 1 , A * ) = 0.9407, C(A 2 , A * ) = 0.9571, C(A 3 , A * ) = 0.7547 and C(A 4 , A * ) = 0.8926. Clearly, seen that the best alternative is A 2 .…”
Section: Comparative Analysis With Cifs Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Garg and Rani [51] presented exponential, logarithm and compensative AOs for aggregating the different CIFSs. However, Garg and Rani [52] presented the study on the various information measures of CIFSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%