1906
DOI: 10.1017/s0370164600008531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Results in the Mathematical Theory of Seiches

Abstract: I propose in this preliminary communication to lay before the Society some results of investigations in the theory of Seiches in a lake whose line of maximum depth is approximately straight, and whose depth, cross section, and surface breadth do not vary rapidly from point to point.As the seiche disturbance is small compared with the length of the lake, I shall make the assumptions usual in the theory of long waves:—viz., that the squares of the displacements and of their derivatives are negligible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tn = 2 l/n x/g h, where l= 28 km, h = 51 m yields T~ = 41.7 minutes, with a nodal line southeast of 'Meilen', the higher mode periods being an integral fraction of this. Early experiences [see Forel (1893), Schweitzer (1909), Chrystal (1904, 1905 and others] indicate that these results are likely to be inaccurate and thus necessitate application of bathymetry adjusted formulations. While Chrystal's channel formulation would suffice, since Coriolis effects have only insignificant influence, transverse structure of 3) Here, I is the lenght measured along the Thalweg, h the mean depth, g the gravity constant and n an integer.…”
Section: Lake Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tn = 2 l/n x/g h, where l= 28 km, h = 51 m yields T~ = 41.7 minutes, with a nodal line southeast of 'Meilen', the higher mode periods being an integral fraction of this. Early experiences [see Forel (1893), Schweitzer (1909), Chrystal (1904, 1905 and others] indicate that these results are likely to be inaccurate and thus necessitate application of bathymetry adjusted formulations. While Chrystal's channel formulation would suffice, since Coriolis effects have only insignificant influence, transverse structure of 3) Here, I is the lenght measured along the Thalweg, h the mean depth, g the gravity constant and n an integer.…”
Section: Lake Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formula was extended later by Du Boys (1891) to situations of basins with irregular shape. His formula is still approximate, and was soon replaced by the mathematically sounder theory of Chrystal (1904Chrystal ( , 1905 which permitted calculation of seiche periods in elongated basins with arbitrary shape. Of similar complexity is Defant's (1918) theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatially one:dimensional Chrystal [ 1,2] equation valid for elongated basins, does not allow prediction of positively and negatively rotationg amphidromic systems, even when complemented by the Kelvin-wave dynamics approach but has the advantage of being computationally simple and in expensive. The curvature of the basin axis is ignored in this channel model and the selection of the axis is rather arbitrary so "there is an element of subjectivity in prescribing the channel axis which can cause error..." [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of Chrystal (1904Chrystal ( , 1905aChrystal ( , 1905b, Honda et a1. (1908), Proudman (1914), Defant (1918), Ertel (1933), and Hidaka (1936) are well known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%