1983
DOI: 10.1080/03610928308828586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Restricted randomization rules in sequential designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
134
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
134
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomization was performed centrally, in 1:1:1:1 allocation between arms, stratified by the presence of cavitation on baseline chest radiograph and by enrollment site, and restricted to limit imbalance between arms to no more than two subjects (22).…”
Section: Setting Population and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomization was performed centrally, in 1:1:1:1 allocation between arms, stratified by the presence of cavitation on baseline chest radiograph and by enrollment site, and restricted to limit imbalance between arms to no more than two subjects (22).…”
Section: Setting Population and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 This procedure concealed the randomization from individuals who were directly involved with the participants in Memphis. The randomization was conducted within strata from a model with 5 classification factors: maternal race (black versus nonblack), maternal age (<17, 17-18, and ≥19 years), gestational age at enrollment (<20 vs ≥20 weeks), employment status of head of household (employed versus unemployed), and geographic region of residence (4 regions).…”
Section: Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The big stick design (BSD) introduced by Soares and Wu (1983) consists of tossing a fair coin until the imbalance |D i | reaches a maximum tolerated imbalance mti ∈ N.…”
Section: Randomization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%