ABSTRACT:Effect of (glass-fiber/matrix nylon-6) interfacial interactions on fatigue behaviors of glass-fiber reinforced nylon-6 (GF/Ny6) under a strain controlled condition was investigated on the basis of in situ nonlinear dynamic viscoelasticity. Ny6s mixed with surface-modified and -unmodified short glass-fibers (SMSGF and SUSGF) were used as specimens. An extent of nonlinearity of dynamic viscoelasticity was expressed by nonlinear viscoelastic parameter, NVP, which was calculated from coefficients of the Fourier expanded series of the response signal during a fatigue cycle. The nonlinear dynamic viscoelasticity for both (GF/Ny6)s became remarkable with the progress of fatigue damage. The magnitude of NVP for the (SUSGF/Ny6) was always greater than that for the (SMSGF/Ny6) at a given fatigue time. Since the interface between SUSGF and Ny6 was peeled off during the fatigue test due to the weak interaction, the fatigue damage easily occurred for the (SUSGF/Ny6). Such leads to the non-uniform propagation of the imposed strain through the (SUSGF/Ny6), resulting in an increase of NVP. In the case of the (SMSGF/Ny6), the fatigue damage slowly progressed due to the strong interfacial interaction. Consequently, the nonlinearity of the dynamic viscoelasticity for the (SMSGF/Ny6) was depressed in comparison with the (SUSGF/Ny6).KEY WORDS Fatigue Behavior / Short Glass-Fiber Reinforced Nylon-6 / Interfacial Interaction / Nonlinear Viscoelastic Parameter / Polymer composites are a class of materials that polymer matrix is reinforced by fillers such as glassfibers or carbon-fibers with a small amount. Recently, polymer composites have been widely used for structural components of transports and constructions as substitutes of metal materials due to their comparatively high specific strength and modulus. When polymer composites are applied to the above-mentioned purpose, it is important to understand the fatigue mechanisms, and to predict the fatigue lifetime. This is because the fatigue fracture of them could cause fatal accidents.Fatigue mechanisms of fiber-reinforced polymers have been discussed on the basis of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations of fractured surfaces. 1, 2 In general, a fatigue damage of polymer composites starts from debonding at fiber ends. Then, the debonding progresses along the (fiber / polymer) interface, and eventually, polymer composites are fractured. In the case of weak interfacial interaction, debonding easily progresses even at the initial stage of fatigue cycles. On the contrary, interfacial debonding is hard to occur for composites with strong interfacial interaction and thus an imposed load effectively transfers from matrix polymer to fibers, resulting in an improvement of fatigue strength. 1,[3][4][5][6][7] Although SEM is an useful apparatus, fatigue tests must be interrupted to observe sample surfaces. Therefore, it seems difficult by SEM observation to follow how fatigue damages such as interfacial debonding progress in a specimen. In order to clarify the fatigue fracture...