2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.02.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks on the indoor radon distribution in a country

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kutatásaik központjában az állt, hogy a bányászati alagút közelsége milyen mértékben befolyásolja a családi házak radon szintjét. HÁMORI et al (2006a;2006b) több mint 15000 lakásban végeztek méréseket, mérési eredményeik átlaga 133 Bq/m 3 volt. Később MINDA et al (2009) 17244 lakásra terjesztették ki megfigyeléseiket.…”
Section: Bevezetésunclassified
“…Kutatásaik központjában az állt, hogy a bányászati alagút közelsége milyen mértékben befolyásolja a családi házak radon szintjét. HÁMORI et al (2006a;2006b) több mint 15000 lakásban végeztek méréseket, mérési eredményeik átlaga 133 Bq/m 3 volt. Később MINDA et al (2009) 17244 lakásra terjesztették ki megfigyeléseiket.…”
Section: Bevezetésunclassified
“…Applying Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests on the experimental radon data, it has been concluded that experimental data set for average annual radon activity concentrations in Montenegrin homes does not conform to a log-normal distribution [8], just like in a number of other countries [21,[24][25][26][27][28]. In the Montenegrin case, it has been shown [8] that subtracting 7 Bq m -3 from experimental indoor radon concentrations, as assumed radon concentration in outdoor air, and giving a small positive value of 5 Bq m -3 to all negative and zero values resulted because of this subtraction in order to avoid losing experimental data points, transform the experimental data to a set of data which pass both mentioned statistical tests of log-normality.…”
Section: Univariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows that the average annual concentration of 222 Rn in ground floor is higher than that in the 1 st floor, which in turn is higher than that in secind floor in all room types. This result due to the fact that radon cannot climb up easily to the elevated floors because of the density of radon is 7.5 times higher than that of normal air, in addition to the effect of air pressure factor (Hamori, Toth, Losonci, & Minda, 2006). On the other hand, most of these houses are constructed directly on the ground with the small thickness or without any concrete base; also the glass windows prevent good ventilation and they are not frequently opened.…”
Section: Radon Levels and Indoor Doses In Dwellingsmentioning
confidence: 99%