1993
DOI: 10.1016/0926-9851(93)90029-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks on static field thin sheet models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related work has been described by Sarabandi (1992). Thin-sheet models for the static case have been considered recently by Eskola, Soininen & Oksama (1989) and by Eskola et al (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work has been described by Sarabandi (1992). Thin-sheet models for the static case have been considered recently by Eskola, Soininen & Oksama (1989) and by Eskola et al (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the amount of magnetic material in the large pieces can be estimated from the anomalies only if the magnetic properties are known. Smaller pieces of such steel (edge < 5 cm) are magnetically saturated and their anomalies can be 600 L. Eskola, R. Puranen and H. Soininen ᭧ 1999 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Geophysical Prospecting, 47, 593-602 alternatively modelled by assuming that the sheet is at a constant potential (Eskola et al 1993). The amount of magnetic material in the saturated pieces cannot be estimated from the anomaly even if the magnetic properties of the steel piece are known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral equation solutions of a magnetized thin-sheet model have been considered by Eskola (1992, pp. 107-110), and Eskola et al (1993). The thickness of the sheet is regarded as so small that the magnetic field of the sheet is inseparably dependent on the product kt of the susceptibility k and the sheet thickness t. The scalar potential U of the secondary magnetic field H, defined by the relation H ¼ ¹ٌU, can be presented in the form (Stratton 1941, p. 229),…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This appears to be particularly so for those integral equation formulations in which the field is represented in terms of a simple source distribution with density related to the normal component of the field over the surface of the body. Eskola et al (1993) illustrate this type of numerical instability in computing the magnetic field due to relatively thin tabular bodies in a static magnetic field. It can reasonably be expected that the approach proposed by Oksama and Suppala (1993) will display the same type of problem.…”
Section: The General Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%