2012
DOI: 10.1556/aarch.63.2012.2.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks on military pottery in Aquincum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…‘Legionary wares’ have been variously defined by the range of finishes and functional groups associated with military sites; in a handful of cases their production has been attributed to known military kilnworks. While Ettlinger first outlined a relationship between pottery assemblages at different military sites across the northern frontier, coining the term ‘legionary pottery’ (, as referenced in Vamos , 402–3), Greene further and more loosely adapted the definition of ‘legionary wares’ to include a wider range of pottery styles, extending across a greater geographical frame. His definition encompassed a locally uncommon range of finewares influenced by metal and glass prototypes and finished with ‘red slip‐coating, marbling, slip‐painting, or barbotine work, moulded or stamped decoration, mica‐dusting and lead‐glazing’, as well as coarsewares in forms such as flagons, bowls and mortaria (Greene , 113).…”
Section: Situating Legionary Waresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…‘Legionary wares’ have been variously defined by the range of finishes and functional groups associated with military sites; in a handful of cases their production has been attributed to known military kilnworks. While Ettlinger first outlined a relationship between pottery assemblages at different military sites across the northern frontier, coining the term ‘legionary pottery’ (, as referenced in Vamos , 402–3), Greene further and more loosely adapted the definition of ‘legionary wares’ to include a wider range of pottery styles, extending across a greater geographical frame. His definition encompassed a locally uncommon range of finewares influenced by metal and glass prototypes and finished with ‘red slip‐coating, marbling, slip‐painting, or barbotine work, moulded or stamped decoration, mica‐dusting and lead‐glazing’, as well as coarsewares in forms such as flagons, bowls and mortaria (Greene , 113).…”
Section: Situating Legionary Waresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other discussions have focused on the personal backgrounds of the producers themselves – potters who display significant versatility and skill in manufacturing a range of pottery types. This has been seen as reflecting either mobile civilian potters following the military and working in a ‘foreign’ tradition (Greene ; Vamos ) or local civilian potters commissioned by the military to manufacture specific forms (Swan ); or, occasionally, wares appear to have been manufactured by legionaries working within the ranks of the military itself (Haalebos and Koster , 69–70). The complicated nature of a highly mobile consumer base with complex supply chains makes the collective interpretation of these wares particularly challenging.…”
Section: Situating Legionary Waresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation