2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.05.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks on James–Schreier spaces

Abstract: The James-Schreier spaces V p , where 1 p < ∞, were recently introduced by Bird and Laustsen (in press) [5] as an amalgamation of James' quasi-reflexive Banach space on the one hand and Schreier's Banach space giving a counterexample to the Banach-Saks property on the other. The purpose of this note is to answer some questions left open in Bird and Laustsen (in press) [5]. Specifically, we prove that (i) the standard Schauder basis for the first James-Schreier space V 1 is shrinking, and (ii) any two Schreier … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wp < ∞ , and the James-Schreier space, V p := span {e n : n ∈ N} ⊂ W p . We let X p := bip(V p ) with norm • Xp := • bip(Vp), and recall that X p = W p +Cχ N ∼ = V p[2, 4.15], due to the shrinking basis of V p (proved in[2, 4.12] in the case p > 1, and[3] for p = 1). We write • Vp when we consider • Wp restricted to V p .Lemma 4.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wp < ∞ , and the James-Schreier space, V p := span {e n : n ∈ N} ⊂ W p . We let X p := bip(V p ) with norm • Xp := • bip(Vp), and recall that X p = W p +Cχ N ∼ = V p[2, 4.15], due to the shrinking basis of V p (proved in[2, 4.12] in the case p > 1, and[3] for p = 1). We write • Vp when we consider • Wp restricted to V p .Lemma 4.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%