2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2006.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some refinements of rough -means clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Peters [23] pointed out some potential pitfalls of the algorithm in terms of objective function and numerical stability and suggested some improvements to overcome these. Equation 10 is revised to…”
Section: Rough C-meansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peters [23] pointed out some potential pitfalls of the algorithm in terms of objective function and numerical stability and suggested some improvements to overcome these. Equation 10 is revised to…”
Section: Rough C-meansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rough K-means approach has been a subject of further research. Peters [14] discussed various refinements of Lingras and West's original proposal [5]. These included calculation of rough centroids and the use of ratios of distances as opposed to differences between distances similar to those used in the rough set based Kohonen algorithm described in [6].…”
Section: Rough Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included calculation of rough centroids and the use of ratios of distances as opposed to differences between distances similar to those used in the rough set based Kohonen algorithm described in [6]. The rough K-means and its various extensions [12], [14] have been found to be effective in distance based clustering. However, there is no theoretical work that proves that rough K-means explicitly finds an optimal clustering scheme.…”
Section: Rough Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A technique combining k-means and rough set approaches proposed in [13] introduced the concept of upper and lower bounds to the k-means centroid. An enhancement to this technique was proposed in [14]. But the main drawback is that these techniques do not address the problem of selection of initial parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%