2016
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Recent Trends in the Linguistic Anthropology of Native North America

Abstract: Although the languages of Native North America and the linguistic communities that spoke these languages once provided the key data for American anthropology's early agenda under Boas, linguistic anthropologists continue their study in a manner inflected to contemporary political economic realities and theoretical concerns. One area of scholarship that displays some continuity with earlier research is the study of Native American place-names, but even here contemporary researchers have explored the ethnographi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A vibrant area of critical study is emerging from ethnographic studies of settler colonial and indigenous contexts. In his review essay of Native North American linguistic anthropology, Paul Kroskrity () chronicles the tremendous scholarship that has emerged from the Boasian legacy of the study of Native American languages (Boas [] 1995). Careful to remind us of the significant revisions to the Boasian approach—most notably the influence of ethnography of communication studies and interactional sociolinguistics—Kroskrity traces the progression from the unconscious patterning of thought furthered in the work of Edward Sapir and especially Benjamin Lee Whorf to a language ideologies framework rooted in nation, sovereignty, and political economy.…”
Section: Participation and Social (In)justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vibrant area of critical study is emerging from ethnographic studies of settler colonial and indigenous contexts. In his review essay of Native North American linguistic anthropology, Paul Kroskrity () chronicles the tremendous scholarship that has emerged from the Boasian legacy of the study of Native American languages (Boas [] 1995). Careful to remind us of the significant revisions to the Boasian approach—most notably the influence of ethnography of communication studies and interactional sociolinguistics—Kroskrity traces the progression from the unconscious patterning of thought furthered in the work of Edward Sapir and especially Benjamin Lee Whorf to a language ideologies framework rooted in nation, sovereignty, and political economy.…”
Section: Participation and Social (In)justicementioning
confidence: 99%