Some Reasons Why Preclinical Studies of Psychiatric Disorders Fail to Translate: What Can Be Rescued from the Misunderstanding and Misuse of Animal ‘Models’?

Abstract

The repeated failure of animal models to yield findings that translate into humans is a serious threat to the credibility of preclinical biomedical research. The use of animals in research that lacks translational validity is unacceptable in any ethical environment, and so this problem needs urgent attention. To reproduce any human illness in animals is a serious challenge, but this is especially the case for psychiatric disorders. Yet, many authors do not hesitate to describe their findings as a ‘model’ of such a disorder. More cautious scientists describe the behavioural phenotype as ‘disorder-like’, without specifying the way(s) in which the abnormal behaviour could be regarded as being analogous to any of the diagnostic features of the disorder in question. By way of discussing these problems, this article focuses on common, but flawed, assumptions that pervade preclinical research of depression and antidepressants. Particular attention is given to the difference between putative ‘models’ of this illness and predictive screens for candidate drug treatments, which is evidently widely misunderstood. However, the problems highlighted in this article are generic and afflict research of all psychiatric disorders. This dire situation will be resolved only when funders and journal editors take action to ensure that researchers interpret their findings in a less ambitious, but more realistic, evidence-based way that would parallel changes in research of the cause(s), diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric problems in humans.

Reliability of sucrose preference testing following short or no food and water deprivation - a Systematic Review and Meta–Analysis of rat models of chronic unpredictable stress

“…Thus misleading conclusions are reached that risk painting an inflated and unrealistic picture of the change in reward sensitivity. This has tremendous implications for the translatability and ethics of the research in the area 40 . Not only are the effects that future studies base their power analysis on inexact, perpetuating the unethical cycle of animal use for inconclusive research, they also lead to overly optimistic predictions of the effects of new therapeutic strategies.…”

The Open Field Test

“…Moreover, the behaviour of an animal in any test situation should be described in terms of exactly what it is without unjustified anthropomorphic interpretation [167,168].…”

The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in threat detection: task choice and rodent experience

“…The validation of a task for translational potential is complex, including for pharmacological predictive validity for complex neuropsychiatric disorders like anxiety [34][35][36]. Another evident impression gained from the systematic review of the recent literature was that many distinct tasks were used to investigate BNST function in anxiety-like behaviour (Figure 2).…”