Proceedings of the 1980 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data - SIGMOD '80 1980
DOI: 10.1145/582250.582276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some properties of Cartesian product files

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since m3 = 11 = 3 -m + 2, we have u = 3, v = 2 while t = (1 + z9=1,+3 ci)mod m = 6 mod 3 = 0. Thus no = nl = u + 1 = 4 while n2 = u = 3 and hence (no, nl , n8) = (4,4,3) z (1, 1, 0). 1, 2, 1, 0, .…”
Section: Partial Match Queries and Cartesian Product Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since m3 = 11 = 3 -m + 2, we have u = 3, v = 2 while t = (1 + z9=1,+3 ci)mod m = 6 mod 3 = 0. Thus no = nl = u + 1 = 4 while n2 = u = 3 and hence (no, nl , n8) = (4,4,3) z (1, 1, 0). 1, 2, 1, 0, .…”
Section: Partial Match Queries and Cartesian Product Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under those conditions, only one bucket would need to be accessed in response to the most frequently asked queries in which the first attribute is specified. It was pointed out by Lin, Lee, and Du [4] that a Cartesian product file exhibits the property of clustering similar records into the same or similar buckets, and it was later shown by Chang, Lee, and Du [3] that the concept of Cartesian product files is effective for partial match queries.…”
Section: Partial Match Queries and Cartesian Product Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations