1958
DOI: 10.1016/s1385-7258(58)50026-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some properties of a class of generalized legendre’s associated functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1958
1958
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KUTPERS and B. METJLENBELD*. 1. In previous papers ( [1], [2]) we considered the differential equation: n dw ( m 2 n 2 2 l and defined two solutions P%-n (z) and Q™ >n {z) of (1) for all points of the z-plane in which a crosscut exists along the real axis from 1 to -oo.…”
Section: Quadratic Expansions Of Generalized Legendre's Associated Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…KUTPERS and B. METJLENBELD*. 1. In previous papers ( [1], [2]) we considered the differential equation: n dw ( m 2 n 2 2 l and defined two solutions P%-n (z) and Q™ >n {z) of (1) for all points of the z-plane in which a crosscut exists along the real axis from 1 to -oo.…”
Section: Quadratic Expansions Of Generalized Legendre's Associated Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. In previous papers ( [1], [2]) we considered the differential equation: n dw ( m 2 n 2 2 l and defined two solutions P%-n (z) and Q™ >n {z) of (1) for all points of the z-plane in which a crosscut exists along the real axis from 1 to -oo. In [3] we gave tables of expansions for these functions in terms of hypergeometric functions F{a, b; c; £}, where £ is a linear function of z.…”
Section: Quadratic Expansions Of Generalized Legendre's Associated Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Theorem 2 replace m by -m and n by -n, use (5) for the left-hand side and (13) for the right-hand side, split up the integral in the right-hand side (this is allowed because both integrals exist under given conditions) and in the integral involving P'(-x) change x into -x. This completes the proof.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%