2013
DOI: 10.2478/s11533-013-0358-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some problems on narrow operators on function spaces

Abstract: It is known that if a rearrangement invariant (r.i.) space E on [0 1] has an unconditional basis then every linear bounded operator on E is a sum of two narrow operators. On the other hand, for the classical space E = L 1 [0 1] having no unconditional basis the sum of two narrow operators is a narrow operator. We show that a Köthe space on [0 1] having "lots" of nonnarrow operators that are sum of two narrow operators need not have an unconditional basis. However, we do not know if such an r.i. space exists. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a sum of two narrow operators on L 1 is narrow, but on an r.i. space E on [0, 1] with an unconditional basis every operator is a sum of two narrow operators. Similar questions are very interesting and some of them are involved, see problems [18,Chapter 12] and recent papers [11], [17]. In 2009 O. Maslyuchenko, Mykhaylyuk and the second named author discovered that the sum phenomenon for narrow operators has a pure lattice nature, extending the notion to vector lattices [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, a sum of two narrow operators on L 1 is narrow, but on an r.i. space E on [0, 1] with an unconditional basis every operator is a sum of two narrow operators. Similar questions are very interesting and some of them are involved, see problems [18,Chapter 12] and recent papers [11], [17]. In 2009 O. Maslyuchenko, Mykhaylyuk and the second named author discovered that the sum phenomenon for narrow operators has a pure lattice nature, extending the notion to vector lattices [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…p.161]). The main result in this subsection is linked with the following open problem stated in [27]:…”
Section: Proof Of Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%