1992
DOI: 10.1070/rm1992v047n05abeh000944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some problems in the theory of multiple trigonometric series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we prove that these conditions are satisfied for a rather natural class of partial sums of Fourier series, where the domains Gn are convex with respect to each coordinate direction. The same result was established by D'yachenko [6] under the more restrictive assumptions that for each k E Gn all integer points of the rectangle [1, kl] x ..-x [1, kd] are also contained in G~.…”
Section: S(h G~ X) --+ H(x)supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we prove that these conditions are satisfied for a rather natural class of partial sums of Fourier series, where the domains Gn are convex with respect to each coordinate direction. The same result was established by D'yachenko [6] under the more restrictive assumptions that for each k E Gn all integer points of the rectangle [1, kl] x ..-x [1, kd] are also contained in G~.…”
Section: S(h G~ X) --+ H(x)supporting
confidence: 62%
“…The proof in [4] was based on Hardy's theorem and on Telyakovskii's result [5] on the uniform boundedness of some special trigonometric polynomials of several variables. Using the same scheme, D'yachenko [6,Theorem 7.12] extended Hardy's theorem to partial sums over domains that have the following property: if k belongs to a domain, then all points from the d-dimensional rectangle [1, kl] x ---x [1, kd] are also in the domain.…”
Section: Chandrasekharan and Minakshisundaram [3 Theorem 43] Provedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this paper, we restrict ourselves to questions which were not covered by previous expository papers and which were actively developed over the last 25 years. For example, we do not discuss questions which are quite naturally linked to the mixed moduli of smoothness such as · Different types of convergence of multiple Fourier series (see Chapter I in the surveys [29,104] and the papers [17,28]); in particular, with characterization, representation, embeddings theorems, characterization of approximation spaces, m-term approximation, which are fast growing topics nowadays. Let us only mention a few basic older papers [42,43,44], the monograph [9] by Besov, Il'in and Nikol'skii, the monograph by Schmeisser and Triebel [71], the recent book by Triebel [93], and the 2006's survey [69] on this topic.…”
Section: What Is Not Included In This Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hardy-Littlewood-Paley theorem,[29]) Let the Fourier series of a function f ∈ L 0 1 (T 2 ) be given by (3.1). (A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of the Lebesgue constants play an important role in the summation of Fourier series, approximation and interpolation theory, and other branches of analysis. Different asymptotic formulas as well as upper and lower estimates of the Lebesgue constants on the d-dimensional torus T d have been known for years (see [9], [12], and [21,Ch. 9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%