1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00860881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some problems in measuring thermal conductivity using the coaxial cylinders method. II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental data combined in Fig. 1 however have been obtained with different methods; the data of Brykov et al [3] with a steady state hot wire method, those of Ganiev and Rastorguev [4], Geller et al [5], Rastorguev et al [6], and Leidenfrost [7] with a vertical concentric cylinder device, those of Poltz and Jugel [8], Sch6del and Grigull [9], Gurenkova et al [10], and Ogiwara et al [11] with a parallel plate device and our own values with a rotating horizontal cylinder device [12]. Because of the variety of the measuring devices it is scarcely possible that the systematic increase of thermal conductivity with layer thickness, as presented in Fig.…”
Section: Convection and Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data combined in Fig. 1 however have been obtained with different methods; the data of Brykov et al [3] with a steady state hot wire method, those of Ganiev and Rastorguev [4], Geller et al [5], Rastorguev et al [6], and Leidenfrost [7] with a vertical concentric cylinder device, those of Poltz and Jugel [8], Sch6del and Grigull [9], Gurenkova et al [10], and Ogiwara et al [11] with a parallel plate device and our own values with a rotating horizontal cylinder device [12]. Because of the variety of the measuring devices it is scarcely possible that the systematic increase of thermal conductivity with layer thickness, as presented in Fig.…”
Section: Convection and Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%