1980
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(80)90051-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some practical procedures for the solution of nonlinear finite element equations

Abstract: Proceduresfor the solution of incremental finite element equations in practical nonlinear analysis are described and evaluated. The methods discussed are employed in static analysis and in dynamic analysis using implicit time integration.The solution procedures are implemented, and practical guidelines for their use are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
5

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
79
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore resort to numerical solutions, and use a fully implicit finite-difference scheme with variable time steps to simulate spatially distributed values of the pressure head and moisture content. The quasi-Newton Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) method [40,41] was used to solve numerically in time Eq.…”
Section: Governing Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore resort to numerical solutions, and use a fully implicit finite-difference scheme with variable time steps to simulate spatially distributed values of the pressure head and moisture content. The quasi-Newton Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) method [40,41] was used to solve numerically in time Eq.…”
Section: Governing Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most cases such algorithm will yield an inaccurate solution or give rise to numerical instability. Discussion on the implementation of nonlinear algorithm is vast in the literature of finite element analysis [1,2,3]. The numerical behavior of various nonlinear solvers is not within present work's scope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Newton-Raphson method is famous for its rapid convergence but is known to fail at points (limit points) on the equilibrium path where the Jacobian (tangent stiffness) is singular or nearly singular. Bathe and Cimento [4] highlight some of the problems with the Newton-Raphson method and present various forms of the method that involve accelerations or line searches to maintain convergence during the solution process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%