The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1974
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-2128-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Practical Issues in the Recent Controversy on the Nature of Scientific Revolutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scheffler (1967) argues that in such a scheme 'independent and public controls are no more, communication has failed, the common universe of things is a delusion, reality itself is made by the scientist rather than discovered by him'. Berkson (1974) claims that belief in the necessity of suspension of criticism after the adoption of a paradigm can cripple fruitful critical activity, and also points out that significant contributions have been made by those who have no faith in the ruling paradigm. Popper (1968) maintains that the hallmark of scientific statements is that they are testable, not that they are grouped around a central paradigm.…”
Section: Normal Geography?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheffler (1967) argues that in such a scheme 'independent and public controls are no more, communication has failed, the common universe of things is a delusion, reality itself is made by the scientist rather than discovered by him'. Berkson (1974) claims that belief in the necessity of suspension of criticism after the adoption of a paradigm can cripple fruitful critical activity, and also points out that significant contributions have been made by those who have no faith in the ruling paradigm. Popper (1968) maintains that the hallmark of scientific statements is that they are testable, not that they are grouped around a central paradigm.…”
Section: Normal Geography?mentioning
confidence: 99%