1969
DOI: 10.2307/254734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Potential Human Problems of the Project Form of Organization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Dill et ai [15] have reported a positive relationship between high managerial authority (and its acceptance) and perceptions of project group effectiveness. Support for the desirability of clear and strong managerial authority for project managers can also be found in the conclusions of Reeser [16] to the effect that those project management situations characterized by ambiguity in the assignment of authority are often problemprojects.…”
Section: Managerial Authoritymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, Dill et ai [15] have reported a positive relationship between high managerial authority (and its acceptance) and perceptions of project group effectiveness. Support for the desirability of clear and strong managerial authority for project managers can also be found in the conclusions of Reeser [16] to the effect that those project management situations characterized by ambiguity in the assignment of authority are often problemprojects.…”
Section: Managerial Authoritymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Earlier we discussed two of the common responses Reeser received when he asked managers in three aerospace companies "What are some of the human problems of project organization1" Of the other eight responses Reeser (1969) reports, six, in fact, relate to structural ambiguities:…”
Section: The Adhocracy 461mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reeser (1969) asked a group of managers in three aero space companies 'What are some of the human problems of project man agement7" Among the common answers were two related to balancing the workload:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joyce (1986) found that the effects of organisational processes in the matrix design affect employees' perceptions and work attitudes. In considering the effects of the matrix power relationship on attitudes, studies by Reeser (1969) and Rizzo, House and Lirtzman, (1970) have shown that the introduction of the dual reporting system can cause role conflict and ambiguity, with the resultant effect being the production of "negative effects on work attitudes like job satisfaction and involvement" (Joyce, 1986:536). It is also noted that quality of interaction has been demonstrated to play a moderating role between the bases of power and compliance, on the one hand, and subordinates' attitudes to superiors (Gupta & Sharma, 2008).…”
Section: Application Of the Framework For This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%