1942
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1942.5.3.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Physiological Aspects of Audiogenic Seizures in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1943
1943
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A corollary mechanism associated with the effects of anoxia may also have contributed to reduced postictal susceptibility. It has been well established that interference with body movements by physical restraint is followed by reduced susceptibility to audiogenic seizures (BureS, 1963;Cain & Naquet, 1950;Frings & Frings, 1952;Griffiths, 1953;Lindsley, Finger, & Henry, 1942;Michels & Sevan, 1952;Willott, 1974). Such protection from seizures is probably related to interference with movement-induced sensory feedback which could influence neural activity responsible for seizures (Willott, 1974), although the occurrence of acidosis can not be ruled out as a possible contributing factor (Wagman, Note 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A corollary mechanism associated with the effects of anoxia may also have contributed to reduced postictal susceptibility. It has been well established that interference with body movements by physical restraint is followed by reduced susceptibility to audiogenic seizures (BureS, 1963;Cain & Naquet, 1950;Frings & Frings, 1952;Griffiths, 1953;Lindsley, Finger, & Henry, 1942;Michels & Sevan, 1952;Willott, 1974). Such protection from seizures is probably related to interference with movement-induced sensory feedback which could influence neural activity responsible for seizures (Willott, 1974), although the occurrence of acidosis can not be ruled out as a possible contributing factor (Wagman, Note 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They confirm and extend the findings that sensory stimuli can inhibit or attenuate seizure activity in human patients (Efron 1956, Henner 1963, Jung 1963, Servit et al 1963 or in animals. Sensory stimuli disrupt epileptic activity produced by aluminum oxide applied to the intralaminar nucleus (Guerrero-Figueroa et al 1963) or hippocampus (Guerrero-Figueroa et al 1966), by penicillin applied to the center median thalamic nucleus (Atzev 1963), by strychnine applied to the cortex (Lairy -Bounes et al 1952), by auditory stimulation (BureS 1953, Lindsley et al 1943) and by electroconvulsive shock De Luca 1969, Pinel 1971). Pinel and Chorover (1972) studied blockage by various types of sensory stimulation of epileptiform discharges produced in rats by chlorambucil i.p., and found that those stimuli producing the longest periods of cortical asynchrony were the same stimuli that produced the greatest blockage af epileptiform activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fist place it is an old clinical empirism, known ever since the time of Galenus and described in detail by Jackson and other authors, that certain motor manoeuvres of the patient combined with strong sensitive atrerence can arrest the development of a fit, A strong biologically significant stimulus also proved effective in experiments (8,31,45). In the fist place it is an old clinical empirism, known ever since the time of Galenus and described in detail by Jackson and other authors, that certain motor manoeuvres of the patient combined with strong sensitive atrerence can arrest the development of a fit, A strong biologically significant stimulus also proved effective in experiments (8,31,45).…”
Section: J ~Tercmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What justifies our assumption about the existence of these defence mechanisms? In the fist place it is an old clinical empirism, known ever since the time of Galenus and described in detail by Jackson and other authors, that certain motor manoeuvres of the patient combined with strong sensitive atrerence can arrest the development of a fit, A strong biologically significant stimulus also proved effective in experiments (8,31,45). Seizure susceptibility can be modified by a permanent diminution of the afference from important receptors, e.g.…”
Section: J ~Tercmentioning
confidence: 99%