1960
DOI: 10.1007/bf01394644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some physical properties of pot-plant composts and their effect on plant growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
8

Year Published

1961
1961
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical properties of these substrates show that 20% and 40% SPW substrates had higher AS than 20% PL substrate, but these substrates were not significantly different in AS from 30% SPW substrate (Table 1). The higher AS could account for an increase in root dry mass in the 20% SPW; other researchers have observed an increase in root growth with higher (around 20% to 25% by volume) air-filled porosity (Bunt, 1961;Strojny and Nowak, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Physical properties of these substrates show that 20% and 40% SPW substrates had higher AS than 20% PL substrate, but these substrates were not significantly different in AS from 30% SPW substrate (Table 1). The higher AS could account for an increase in root dry mass in the 20% SPW; other researchers have observed an increase in root growth with higher (around 20% to 25% by volume) air-filled porosity (Bunt, 1961;Strojny and Nowak, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the cultivation in containers, regardless of the substrate used, there is limitation of space for root expansion, so it is necessary that the medium be able to maintain a volume of water easily available to the plants, without compromising the oxygen concentration (Bunt, 1961). Other characteristics considered essential for the substrate are: having good structure and consistency, not contracting or expanding excessively with moisture variation, being free of toxic substances, inoculum of diseases, invasive plants, insects and excess salts, and being readily available (Kämpf, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As substrate science develops, understanding more about using dynamic hydraulic properties as measures of substrate productivity as it relates to resource (i.e., water and mineral nutrient) sustainability is becoming imperative (Caron et al, 2014). For example, moisture characteristic curves (MCC) provide information on dynamic hydraulic properties that depict the relationship between volumetric water contents (VWCs) and Y (Bunt, 1961). Better defining the relationship between hydraulic conductivity (K) and MCC provides information on substrate environmental sustainability (through increased resource retention; Naasz et al, 2005) and water availability (O'Meara et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%