1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02721325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some physical aspects induced by the internal variable in the theory of fields in Finsler spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A non-expert in special directions of differential geometry and geometric mechanics, may not know that beginning E. Cartan (1935) [15] various models of Finsler geometry were developed alternatively by using metric compatible connections which resulted in generalizations to the geometry of Lagrange and Hamilton mechanics and their higher order extensions. Such works and monographs were published by prominent schools and authors on Finsler geometry and generalizations from Romania and Japan [37,38,34,35,39,36,25,26,24,57,84,33,41,42,44,45,10,11] following approaches quite different from the geometry of symplectic mechanics and generalizations [30,31,32,29]. As a matter of principle, all geometric constructions with the Chern and/or simplectic connections can de redefined equivalently for metric compatible geometries, but the philosophy, aims, mathematical formalism and physical consequences are very different for different approaches and the particle physics researches usually are not familiar with such results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-expert in special directions of differential geometry and geometric mechanics, may not know that beginning E. Cartan (1935) [15] various models of Finsler geometry were developed alternatively by using metric compatible connections which resulted in generalizations to the geometry of Lagrange and Hamilton mechanics and their higher order extensions. Such works and monographs were published by prominent schools and authors on Finsler geometry and generalizations from Romania and Japan [37,38,34,35,39,36,25,26,24,57,84,33,41,42,44,45,10,11] following approaches quite different from the geometry of symplectic mechanics and generalizations [30,31,32,29]. As a matter of principle, all geometric constructions with the Chern and/or simplectic connections can de redefined equivalently for metric compatible geometries, but the philosophy, aims, mathematical formalism and physical consequences are very different for different approaches and the particle physics researches usually are not familiar with such results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a viewpoint of Finslerian field theory, a "fluctuation," "nonlocality," or "anisotropy" is expressed by a variable attached to each point. [28][29][30][31][32][65][66][67] For example, when a macroscopic displacement is attached to each point, the geometric framework is described by a first-order vector bundle. [27] However, in the micromechanics, the microrotation is defined at the one more microscopic level than the macroscopic displacement level.…”
Section: Parallelism and Geometric Objects In Second-order Vector Bundlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tangent bundle over M is defined by TM, and the local coordinate system on TM is (xα,yα). According to the Finsler field theory, the vector yα of (xα,yα) on TM is regarded as a “fluctuation”, “anisotropy” or “non‐locality” at some microscopic field. The non‐local property of yα geometrically effects on a macroscopic field expressed by (xα) through a reduction process of non‐Riemann space as follows.…”
Section: Differential Geometry Of Fractional‐order Differential Equatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the macroscopic field (xα) non‐localized by the microscopic fluctuation yαfalse(xfalse) gives the non‐Riemannian structure. Such reduction process R2(n+1)Fn+1trueR¯n+1 is represented as osculating conditions from the Finsler space …”
Section: Differential Geometry Of Fractional‐order Differential Equatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation