2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41230-018-8166-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some paradoxical observations about spheroidal graphite degeneracy

Abstract: T he control of graphite shape in spheroidal graphite cast irons is primarily achieved by limited additions of magnesium, though rare earths may also be added to sustain the spheroidization treatment. To avoid fading of the spheroidization treatment, in particular when casting heavy-section parts, it could be tempting to overtreat the melt. However, it has been long recognized that magnesium and rare earth over-treatment leads to spheroidal graphite degenerating in chunky graphite. Conversely, under-treatment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in fact what is observed in Fig. 3 where are compared the microstructures of a compacted graphite and of a lamellar graphite cast irons that have been solidified in the same conditions (thermal cup) [34] . It is seen that the graphite lamella are much coarser and much less branched in compacted graphite than in lamellar graphite material.…”
Section: Growth Ratesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This is in fact what is observed in Fig. 3 where are compared the microstructures of a compacted graphite and of a lamellar graphite cast irons that have been solidified in the same conditions (thermal cup) [34] . It is seen that the graphite lamella are much coarser and much less branched in compacted graphite than in lamellar graphite material.…”
Section: Growth Ratesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…(a) (b) It has been reported previously that the growth rate of compacted graphite cells is comparable though slower than that of lamellar graphite cells [23]. That it is slower at the start of growth may be in relation with the low capability of compacted graphite to branch [24], and thus to the increased distance between graphite worm-like flakes as compared to the flakes in LGI. At the end of solidification, the slowing down of the growth rate of the compacted graphite cells could possibly be related to the accumulation of magnesium rejected by austenite, which has been suggested to leading to austenite closing up around graphite precipitates [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As a main outcome, we identified a microstructural transition between decoupled-and coupled-growth as a function of the solidification velocity. Qualitative features that 1274 (2023) 012033 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1274/1/012033 2 were thus revealed in a model transparent system shed new light on previous observations in metallic irregular-eutectic alloys, such as austenite/graphite eutectic in cast irons [4] and Ni-Ni 3 Sn 4 alloy [5]. In this work, we present observations of the growth dynamics in thin AMPD-SCN samples during rotating directional solidification (RDS) experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%