1969
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000031127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some observations on the worm burdens of calves infected daily with Ostertagia ostertagi

Abstract: Two experiments are described in each of which three groups of calves received infective larvae of Ostertagia ostertagi daily, each group at a different rate. Changes in worm burdens were followed by the periodic slaughter of calves.Numbers of adult worms quickly rose to and remained at levels which bore a positive relation to the infection rate. There was evidence that a turnover of worms was occurring and it appeared that burdens of adult worms were regulated by a loss of worms which depended on the number p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of untreated animals in a FECRT has been recommended to detect changes in the FEC of a herd not related with the treatment, and for the correction of such fluctuations in the estimation of drug efficacy (Coles et al., 1992, Lyndal-Murphy et al., 2014). However, the inclusion of a control group is based on the assumption that treated and untreated animals with comparable FEC share similar worm burdens, which may not be always the case in cattle (Michel, 1967, Michel, 1969). Moreover, the density-dependent control of fecundity in some bovine nematodes, such as in O. ostertagi , may reduce the FEC in untreated animals due to newly acquired infections and could increase the egg excretion of female worms in treated groups due to lower worm burden and competition (Dobson et al., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of untreated animals in a FECRT has been recommended to detect changes in the FEC of a herd not related with the treatment, and for the correction of such fluctuations in the estimation of drug efficacy (Coles et al., 1992, Lyndal-Murphy et al., 2014). However, the inclusion of a control group is based on the assumption that treated and untreated animals with comparable FEC share similar worm burdens, which may not be always the case in cattle (Michel, 1967, Michel, 1969). Moreover, the density-dependent control of fecundity in some bovine nematodes, such as in O. ostertagi , may reduce the FEC in untreated animals due to newly acquired infections and could increase the egg excretion of female worms in treated groups due to lower worm burden and competition (Dobson et al., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worm egg counts were made using the modified McMaster technique (Michel, 1969). All other animals were sampled at weekly intervals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abomasum and its contents were processed in the manner described by Michel (1969) where the material was sieved through a tier of screens, a process involving prolonged washing with a jet of cold tap water. The residue containing the live worms was fixed by the addition of an approximately equal volume of 5% formol-saline and stored.…”
Section: Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%