1959
DOI: 10.2307/2009213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Observations on Political Gaming

Abstract: During the past five years the Social Science Division of The RAND Corporation has been developing a procedure for the study of foreign affairs that we call “political gaming.” This article gives a brief description of the technique and some of our observations about its utility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite an increase in the projects scope, the application of game theory turned out to be quite difficult. Failure to predict outcomes in empirical situations was a contributing factor to a reaction against game theory at RAND, which, in turn, helped foster a set of more realistic approaches such as gaming and scenario planning, as well as a set of insights about the importance of organizational behaviors on decision-making (Goldhamer and Speier 1959). Hitch at the time noted, '[f ]or our purposes, game theory has been quite disappointing' (Hitch in Kraft 1960, 76), but acknowledging the limitations and the increasing awareness of the importance of human and organizational factors in the complex strategic environment helped spur work for instance on the application of organizational behavior to strategic analysis (Allison and Marshall 1968;Marshall 1968).…”
Section: Rand Rationality and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite an increase in the projects scope, the application of game theory turned out to be quite difficult. Failure to predict outcomes in empirical situations was a contributing factor to a reaction against game theory at RAND, which, in turn, helped foster a set of more realistic approaches such as gaming and scenario planning, as well as a set of insights about the importance of organizational behaviors on decision-making (Goldhamer and Speier 1959). Hitch at the time noted, '[f ]or our purposes, game theory has been quite disappointing' (Hitch in Kraft 1960, 76), but acknowledging the limitations and the increasing awareness of the importance of human and organizational factors in the complex strategic environment helped spur work for instance on the application of organizational behavior to strategic analysis (Allison and Marshall 1968;Marshall 1968).…”
Section: Rand Rationality and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before it began, players of each national team composed a secret strategy paper that elucidated the goals they would attempt to achieve. In the course of play, each team's moves were made via a short report, submitted to referees, in which a team's members stated “the motives of their moves and the expectations on which they were based” (Goldhamer & Speier, , pp. 74–75).…”
Section: From Antagonism To Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Political Science, their main use has been in the area of international relations and security (e.g. Goldhamer & Speier 1959;Cohen 1962;Vincent & Shepherd 1998;Chasek 2005: however note Endersby & Webber 1995 as an example of domestic politics), largely because of the methodologies utilised. In most simulations, roles and topics are pre-defined and prescriptive, rather than organic and in continuing interplay with real-world events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%