2008
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drn056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some numerical methods for second-kind Fredholm integral equations on the real semiaxis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we will discuss the convergence and the stability of the previous rules. About the formula (7), recently it was proved in [11] that…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we will discuss the convergence and the stability of the previous rules. About the formula (7), recently it was proved in [11] that…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that, by an argument in [6], it is easy to prove that (11) does not hold if in (7) j is replaced by m, i.e. using the ordinary Gaussian rule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the first variable x) evaluated at x k . Under conditions (5) if g, Kf ∈ Z s , s>0, it was proved (see [5, Theorem 2.1]) that the sequence of equations (6) has the unique solutions f n ∈ P n−1 , n = 1, 2, . .…”
Section: Integral Equations Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us note that the polynomialL m (w, f ) has a good behavior in [0, θa m ], with 0 < θ < 1, as it was shown in [12] for β = 1. For the second norm, it was proved in [7] that sup fu ∞ =1 L * * m+1 (w, f )u ∞ C log m under certain assumptions on the parameters α, γ, λ. The order log m cannot be improved [16].…”
Section: Laurita and G Mastroiannimentioning
confidence: 99%