2012
DOI: 10.1186/1029-242x-2012-61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some new two-sided bounds for determinants of diagonally dominant matrices

Abstract: In this article, we present some new two-sided bounds for the determinant of some diagonally dominant matrices. In particular, the idea of the preconditioning technique is applied to obtain the new bounds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, if S = suppW i.e, the support of W , then as seen from [36, equation (85)], any non zero lower bound on det(A * S A S ) 1/K in the limit is enough. So if the matrix A * S A S possesses strong diagonal dominance then it is possible to have such a non zero lower bound on det(A * S A S ) 1/K for every S [57]. These could be ensured by having codewords that are overwhelmingly close to orthogonal.…”
Section: Conversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, if S = suppW i.e, the support of W , then as seen from [36, equation (85)], any non zero lower bound on det(A * S A S ) 1/K in the limit is enough. So if the matrix A * S A S possesses strong diagonal dominance then it is possible to have such a non zero lower bound on det(A * S A S ) 1/K for every S [57]. These could be ensured by having codewords that are overwhelmingly close to orthogonal.…”
Section: Conversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. To prove (13), first we consider a negative definite matrix as a diagonally stable one with a Lyapunov scaling factor D = I and apply Theorem 7. Then we recall that (Sym(A)) −1 and Skew(A) are symmetric and skewsymmetric respectively, thus they are both normal.…”
Section: Lemma 3 Let a B ∈ M N×n Be Symmetric Positive Definite Matri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly for the highorder coefficients in the other cases ( 12), ( 13), (14), and (18) that apply for large ε. When ε = 1, all three of ( 19)- (21) give the maximal determinant 160 for 6 × 6 {±1}-matrices [26,39].…”
Section: Small Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many bounds on determinants of diagonally dominant matrices A have been given in the literature. See, for example, Muir [24], Ostrowski [32], Price [34], and more recently Bhatia and Jain [2], Elsner [11], Horn and Johnson [18], Ipsen and Rehman [19], Li and Chen [21], and the references given there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%