2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccasm.2010.5622119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some new semi-implicit finite difference schemes for numerical solution of Burgers equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problem 5.10 : We consider the initial and boundary conditions for this example as given in (Asaithambi, 2010; Rahman et al , 2010; Mittal and Jain, 2012): …”
Section: Numerical Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem 5.10 : We consider the initial and boundary conditions for this example as given in (Asaithambi, 2010; Rahman et al , 2010; Mittal and Jain, 2012): …”
Section: Numerical Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far various numerical algorithms such as finite difference and cubic spline finite element methods [6], the group-explicit method [7], the generalized boundary element approach [8], quartic B-splines collocation method [9], quadratic B-splines finite element method [10], finite element method [11], spectral method [32], fourthorder finite difference method [12], a novel numerical scheme [13], explicit and exactexplicit finite difference methods [14], automatic differentiation method [15], Galerkin finite element method [16], cubic B-splines collocation method [17], spectral collocation method [18], Polynomial based differential quadrature method [19], quartic B-splines differential quadrature method [20], least-squares quadratic B-splines finite element method [21], implicit fourth-order compact finite difference scheme [22], some implicit methods [23], variational iteration method [24], homotopy analysis method [25], differential transform method and the homotopy analysis method [26], a numerical method based on Crank-Nicolson [27], modified cubic B-splines collocation method [28] ,differential quadrature method [29][30][31]46,47], some new semi-implicit finite difference schemes [33], Haar wavelet quasilinearization approach [34] etc. have been developed for the numerical solutions of Burgers' equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 21 exhibit that the shock wave exist in the range x ∈ (0.9, 1) at time t = 0.33 for planar geometry ( n = 0). The results are compared with Öziş et al (2003), Kutulay et al (1999), Kutluay et al (2004), Kadalbajoo and Awasthi (2006), Rahman et al (2010) and Jiwari (2012) for time t ≤ 15. It is observed that the numerical solutions by using the proposed method are in good agreement with exact solution for modest values of v and exhibit the better solutions for refined time step Δt.…”
Section: Numerical Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%