Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to discuss the existence of fixed points for new classes of mappings defined on an ordered metric space. The obtained results generalize and improve some fixed point results in the literature. Some examples show the usefulness of our results. MSC: 46N40; 47H10; 54H25; 46T99
“…That is, the contractive condition of Theorem 2.1 in ( [33]) does not hold for this example. (4) Taking F , h, f , take h(x, y, z) = xyz, F (s, t) = st, f (s, t) = s − t, we have actually [33,Theorem 2.7].…”
Section: Example 22 ([3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will illustrate the example to show that our contractions is weaker than that in [33]. The condition can be applied to Theorem 1.14, but not applied to [33, Theorem 2.1].…”
Section: Example 22 ([3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) When h(x, y, z) = (xy + l) z , l > 0, F (s, t) = (1 + l) st , f (s, t) = s − t and l = 1, Theorem 1.14 can reduce to [33,Corollary 2.9]. …”
Section: Example 22 ([3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33]. Our contraction can be reduced to that in [33]. Indeed, [33, Theorem 2.1] is taken as a particular case of Theorem 1.14.…”
Section: Example 22 ([3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Taking F , h, f , take h(x, y, z) = xyz, F (s, t) = st, f (s, t) = s − t, we have actually [33,Theorem 2.7].…”
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the existence of fixed points for new classes of mappings defined on an ordered metric space. The obtained results generalize and improve some fixed point results in the literature. Some examples show the usefulness of our results.
“…That is, the contractive condition of Theorem 2.1 in ( [33]) does not hold for this example. (4) Taking F , h, f , take h(x, y, z) = xyz, F (s, t) = st, f (s, t) = s − t, we have actually [33,Theorem 2.7].…”
Section: Example 22 ([3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will illustrate the example to show that our contractions is weaker than that in [33]. The condition can be applied to Theorem 1.14, but not applied to [33, Theorem 2.1].…”
Section: Example 22 ([3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) When h(x, y, z) = (xy + l) z , l > 0, F (s, t) = (1 + l) st , f (s, t) = s − t and l = 1, Theorem 1.14 can reduce to [33,Corollary 2.9]. …”
Section: Example 22 ([3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33]. Our contraction can be reduced to that in [33]. Indeed, [33, Theorem 2.1] is taken as a particular case of Theorem 1.14.…”
Section: Example 22 ([3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Taking F , h, f , take h(x, y, z) = xyz, F (s, t) = st, f (s, t) = s − t, we have actually [33,Theorem 2.7].…”
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the existence of fixed points for new classes of mappings defined on an ordered metric space. The obtained results generalize and improve some fixed point results in the literature. Some examples show the usefulness of our results.
In this paper, we introduce α-admissible mappings on product spaces and obtain fixed point results for α-admissible Prešić type operators. Our results extend, unify and generalize some known results of the literature. We also provide examples which illustrate the results proved herein and show that how the new results are different from the existing ones.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.