2009
DOI: 10.1134/s0032945209020076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some morphological features of roach Rutilus rutilus (Cyprindae) fry after exposure to toxicants in the early stages of ontogenesis (vertebral phenotypes, plastic features, and fluctuating assymetry)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in vertebral phenotype diversity replicated year after year in R. rutilus underyearlings after their incubation in a 1·4–1·6 µT MF with 500 Hz frequency is in accordance with data on the increase in the number of different vertebral phenotypes in R. rutilus after the embryos were exposed to toxicants (Chebotareva et al , ), as well as with a popular view on population reaction in response to deviations in environmental conditions from the optimum (Carpenter & Brock, ). It should be noted that previously, an increase in the diversity of morphological traits in response to MF action was observed in organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster (Graham et al , ) and Daphnia magna (Krylov & Osipova, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in vertebral phenotype diversity replicated year after year in R. rutilus underyearlings after their incubation in a 1·4–1·6 µT MF with 500 Hz frequency is in accordance with data on the increase in the number of different vertebral phenotypes in R. rutilus after the embryos were exposed to toxicants (Chebotareva et al , ), as well as with a popular view on population reaction in response to deviations in environmental conditions from the optimum (Carpenter & Brock, ). It should be noted that previously, an increase in the diversity of morphological traits in response to MF action was observed in organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster (Graham et al , ) and Daphnia magna (Krylov & Osipova, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Trichlorfon (AgroChina; http://www.agrocn.com) and copper from blue vitriol (CuSO 4 ·5H 2 O, Sigma‐Aldrich; http://www.sigmaaldrich.com) were used as typical organic and inorganic chemical pollutants in the experiments. The effect of trichlorfon in reservoir water at a concentration of 0·01 mg l −1 on R. rutilus embryos was studied because previous studies showed a relatively high survival rate of R. rutilus embryos exposed to the pesticide at this concentration, although this exposure resulted in pronounced morphological and physiological responses as the embryos matured into fry (Talikina et al , ; Chebotareva et al , ). Blue vitriol was also added to reservoir water at a copper ion (Cu 2+ ) concentration of 0·01 mg l −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the industrial expansion and the widespread use of pesticides in agriculture, heavy metals are widely disseminated in aquatic systems. They can cause an increase or decrease in the growth rate of some fishes and, within limits, are necessary for food efficiency and growth rate (Chebotareva et al, 2009). Higher concentrations of heavy metals over fish tolerance limits, on the other hand, have an effect on fish populations, lowering growth, reproduction, and/or survival, and may even kill fish (Zaghloul et al, 2007).…”
Section: Heavy Metals In Surface Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vanyushina (1990) provided a detailed analysis of anomalies found in a wild population, in her description of the development of vertebral centra in R. rutilus from the Rybinsk Reservoir (River Volga), although she did not report the frequency of their occurrence. Statistical comparisons of vertebral abnormalities in R. rutilus in control samples and under various toxic experimental conditions have also been performed (Kas’yanov et al , 2001; Chebotareva, 2009; Chebotareva et al , 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External factors mainly have their effect on skeletal development at the larval and juvenile stages and include unfavourable environmental conditions (Bolla & Holmefjord, 1988; Polo et al , 1991; Marino et al , 1993; Boglione et al , 1994; Haaparanta et al , 1997; Pavlov, 1997; Pavlov & Moksness, 1997; Ershov, 2008). These may be the presence of pollutants and mutagens (Bengtsson, 1975; Bengtsson et al , 1988; Von Westernhagen, 1988; Carls & Rice, 1990; Lindesjoo et al , 1994) or specific rearing or experimental conditions (Piron, 1978; Hose et al , 1984; Wiegand et al , 1989; Daoulas et al , 1991; Chatain, 1994; Takeuchi et al , 1995; Hilomen‐Garcia, 1997; Madsen & Dalsgaard, 1999; Koumoundouros et al , 2001; Fjelldal et al , 2007, 2009; Castro et al , 2008; Boglione et al , 2009; Chebotareva, 2009; Chebotareva et al , 2009). Previous studies suggest that malformations are induced in early stages during the embryonic and larval periods of life, although the causes and mechanisms responsible for individual defects are not always well known (Daoulas et al , 1991; Koumoundouros et al , 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%