Two studies were conducted in which college students and mothers were asked to rate unfamiliar infants shown on videotapes. The infants were described as either full term or premature and as either male or female. In both studies, infants labeled premature were rated more negatively than were infants labeled full term, but infants labeled male and female were rated similarly. The behavioral implications for child rearing as a result of this "prematurity stereotyping" were considered.Recent improvements in the survival rate of infants born prematurely (Kopp & Parmelee, 1979) have been associated with renewed interest in the development and outcome of such infants. One focus of current research on premature infants is the prediction of developmental deficits in these infants. Possible influences on outcome include the medical techniques used in treating the infant, medical complications accompanying prematurity in a particular infant, and the environmental experiences of the infant (Field, Sostek, Goldberg, & Shuman, 1979). The purpose of the present studies was to determine if the caregiving environment of the premature infant might be adversely affected by a "prematurity stereotype," that is, the perceptions and expectations that are elicited by the knowledge that an infant is premature, independent of the characteristics or behavior of the infant.Experimental evidence that adults respond to infants on the basis of stereotypes or expectations, independent of observations of the infant, is available. The paradigm for such studies involves labeling the same infant differently and then observing differences in adults' responses to the infant. This paradigm Portions of this article were presented at the 1982 meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Requests for reprints should be sent to Kathenne A