We consider problems of comparing universal algebras in respect of their conditional algebraic geometries. Such comparisons admit of a quite natural algebraic interpretation. Geometric scales for varieties of algebras constructed based on these relations are a natural tool for classifying the varieties of algebras, discriminator varieties in particular.A basic problem in classical algebraic geometry over a field k is classifying algebraic sets over k, i.e., subsets in k n definable by systems of equations. The groundwork for such a classification is laid by coordinate rings of algebraic sets. If Y is an algebraic set over a field k, then its coordinate ring k[Y ] is a ring of polynomial functions on Y . For arbitrary (affine, quasiaffine, projective, quasiprojective) varieties, there are ring invariants, such as a ring of regular functions, local rings of points, a field of rational functions, which are useful for solving the classification problem in classical algebraic geometry. For more details, we ask the reader to consult, for instance, [1,2].The concepts of an equation, of an algebraic set, and of a coordinate ring, as they are defined in classical algebraic geometry over a field, can naturally be extended to the case of an arbitrary algebraic system in a predicate-free language, i.e., to the case of universal algebra. Ultimately we are faced with a new direction of research, known as universal algebraic geometry.Let A be an arbitrary universal algebra. In this instance an equation is an equality of two termal functions on A. An algebraic set over A is a set of solutions for a system of equations. The coordinate algebra of an algebraic set Y is the quotient algebra of a corresponding free algebra with respect to a radical congruence on Y .Research on universal algebraic geometry was initiated in [3,4], where algebro-geometric objects are defined in relation to an arbitrary variety, and in [5,6], which deal with algebraic geometry ul. Revolyutsii 10-15, Novosibirsk, 630099 Russia; ag.pinus@gmail.com.