2016
DOI: 10.1121/2.0000244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some lessons from the effects of highway noise on birds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for generally similar responses by these species is that they have similar vocal frequency ranges, which are known to correlate with hearing range (Dooling and Popper 2007). Although the exact critical ratio, which is the minimum amplitude necessary at a specific frequency for detection of an acoustic signal, is not known for either species, two other emberizids, the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), and swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana), are reported to have maximum hearing sensitivity at 2-5 kHz (Okanoya andDooling 1988, Gall et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for generally similar responses by these species is that they have similar vocal frequency ranges, which are known to correlate with hearing range (Dooling and Popper 2007). Although the exact critical ratio, which is the minimum amplitude necessary at a specific frequency for detection of an acoustic signal, is not known for either species, two other emberizids, the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), and swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana), are reported to have maximum hearing sensitivity at 2-5 kHz (Okanoya andDooling 1988, Gall et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise file had a high‐pass cut‐off frequency at 100 Hz and a spectral energy decrease of 6.5 dB/kHz toward the higher frequencies (Halfwerk & Slabbekoorn, ; Halfwerk, Bot, et al., ). Based on values of noise levels reported close to the highways (Dooling & Popper, ) and in order to be able to compare current research with results from a previous study (Huet des Aunay et al., ), we broadcast urban noise with a constant amplitude level of 77 dB (re. 20 μPa; measured with a Ro‐LINE SPL meter 1, using “A” weighting, at the typical position of the test bird, 20 cm from the loudspeaker).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La tendencia de aumentar la frecuencia del canto en las aves en respuesta al ruido se debe al solapamiento entre la frecuencia del canto y la frecuencia del ruido [22,25]; esto se explica porque, según Dooling y Popper [26], cuando un vehículo en movimiento produce una intensidad de ruido >40 dB, se da como consecuencia el enmascaramiento del canto en las aves; en las mediciones se obtuvieron valores promedio de 69,34 dB y 55,31 dB, para Potrerillo y CURDN, respectivamente, lo que quiere decir que en las localidades evaluadas el sonido de los autos logra enmascarar los cantos de las especies de aves estudiadas a una distancia de 160 m de la vía principal. Por lo anterior, los individuos de las especies H. flavipes y C. gujanensis aumentan la frecuencia mínima del canto para evitar dicho efecto, logrando así evitar el solapamiento de la frecuencia más baja de los cantos con el ruido.…”
Section: Metodologíaunclassified